<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun, Wind, and Noise II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/sun-wind-and-noise-ii/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/sun-wind-and-noise-ii</link>
	<description>Real News for Real Vermonters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:59:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TopDog</title>
		<link>http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/sun-wind-and-noise-ii/comment-page-1#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>TopDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/?p=883#comment-288</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TopDog...&lt;/strong&gt;

I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TopDog&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I am So Lucky That I found your blog and great articles. I will come to your blog often for finding new great articles from your blog.I am adding your rss feed in my reader Thank you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Joes</title>
		<link>http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/sun-wind-and-noise-ii/comment-page-1#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Joes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/?p=883#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately it seems the discussion on this  bill has degenerated into a political dispute.

People on the left (or right) that want more efficiency, renewables, or greenhouse gas reducations should be against this bill.

The $380 million dollars this bill will cost over the next 20 years would get many times the savings if it focused instead on more efficiency and more cost-effective renewables.

PJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately it seems the discussion on this  bill has degenerated into a political dispute.</p>
<p>People on the left (or right) that want more efficiency, renewables, or greenhouse gas reducations should be against this bill.</p>
<p>The $380 million dollars this bill will cost over the next 20 years would get many times the savings if it focused instead on more efficiency and more cost-effective renewables.</p>
<p>PJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

