<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting Tetchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/getting-tetchy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/getting-tetchy</link>
	<description>Real News for Real Vermonters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:59:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charles Merriman</title>
		<link>http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/getting-tetchy/comment-page-1#comment-3422</link>
		<dc:creator>charles Merriman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vermontnewsguy.com/?p=2245#comment-3422</guid>
		<description>Hi NewsGuy:

I like your piece about techy politics.  And I may agree with you that the SoS ought to be an appointed position (provided that the appointment process promotes nonpartisanship somehow).  But, if you desire change, I think going to nonparty primaries makes more sense. I&#039;m sure you already know the arguments, but there&#039;s a great piece on the subject in the NYT by former SoS Keisling of Oregon: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/opinion/22keisling.html

To be clear, I&#039;m not trying to wiggle out of any hole. I stand firmly behind my Mark Johnson words.  See, e.g., my response to Jack McCullough&#039;s comments on GMD post.  More in the weeds than you probably care to get, but I just don&#039;t want you to think that I&#039;m whimping out.  I believe passionately in what I said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi NewsGuy:</p>
<p>I like your piece about techy politics.  And I may agree with you that the SoS ought to be an appointed position (provided that the appointment process promotes nonpartisanship somehow).  But, if you desire change, I think going to nonparty primaries makes more sense. I&#8217;m sure you already know the arguments, but there&#8217;s a great piece on the subject in the NYT by former SoS Keisling of Oregon: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/opinion/22keisling.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/opinion/22keisling.html?referer=');">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/22/opinion/22keisling.html</a></p>
<p>To be clear, I&#8217;m not trying to wiggle out of any hole. I stand firmly behind my Mark Johnson words.  See, e.g., my response to Jack McCullough&#8217;s comments on GMD post.  More in the weeds than you probably care to get, but I just don&#8217;t want you to think that I&#8217;m whimping out.  I believe passionately in what I said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

